Go Back   The macosxhints Forums > General Discussion > The Coat Room



Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 06-11-2011, 07:30 PM   #221
renaultssoftware
MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pembroke, Ontario
Posts: 2,051
Has anyone used the Amazon app store? Thoughts?
__________________
Get Icon Creator and support me.
renaultssoftware is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 11:34 PM   #222
chabig
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by renaultssoftware
Has anyone used the Amazon app store? Thoughts?

Pay money. Download an installer. It's the same as installing boxed software, but without the box or the disc. It's like shareware has always been. No automatic installation or updating, like there is with the Mac App Store. What else is there to think about?
chabig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 11:46 PM   #223
NaOH
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,852
Or, um, use the Google to find reviews. Like this one from Macworld.
NaOH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 01:52 AM   #224
ThreeBKK
MVP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by renaultssoftware
Has anyone used the Amazon app store? Thoughts?

Amazon has an app store?

I think that's great! If it weren't for them, the iTunes Music Store would probably still be 128 Kb/s and laden with DRM. Competition can be a very good thing.
__________________

➤ Think it's a good idea to put your most intimate data on someone else's server?
Macmini5,2 2.7 GHz Core i7 Snow Leopard Mtn Lion
ThreeBKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 07:43 AM   #225
renaultssoftware
MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pembroke, Ontario
Posts: 2,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaOH
Or, um, use the Google to find reviews. Like this one from Macworld.

I was looking for personal experiences with the thing. Thanks for the link, though, good read.
__________________
Get Icon Creator and support me.
renaultssoftware is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 09:07 AM   #226
chabig
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeBKK
I think that's great! If it weren't for them, the iTunes Music Store would probably still be 128 Kb/s and laden with DRM. Competition can be a very good thing.

Let's stick to facts. While competition may be good, Amazon didn't force Apple to drop DRM. It was the music companies that forced Apple to adopt DRM. Apple led the industry in calling for an end to DRM.
chabig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 11:32 AM   #227
ThreeBKK
MVP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,626
I'm very interested in just sticking to facts, but how are you going to prove that your facts are accurate, and that mine are inaccurate? (Please don't do that in this thread. It's really just a rhetorical question.) If I recall correctly, it was Amazon who came out with DRM-free 256 Kb/s downloads first. Apple followed shortly after. Just an observation (from which we could probably draw many conclusions).
__________________

➤ Think it's a good idea to put your most intimate data on someone else's server?
Macmini5,2 2.7 GHz Core i7 Snow Leopard Mtn Lion

Last edited by ThreeBKK; 06-12-2011 at 12:02 PM.
ThreeBKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 12:35 PM   #228
NaOH
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,852
Steve Jobs published his "Thoughts on Music" piece in February 2007, seven months before Amazon began such sales. Wrote Jobs,
Quote:
If the big four music companies would license Apple their music without the requirement that it be protected with a DRM, we would switch to selling only DRM-free music on our iTunes store. Every iPod ever made will play this DRM-free music.

The NY Times, reporting the same day of Jobs published "Thoughts on Music,"
Quote:
A senior executive at one company, who requested anonymity to avoid straining relations with Apple, said that while labels might experiment with other forms of copy-protection software, “we’re not going to broadly license our content for unprotected digital distribution.”

Four months after Amazon began DRM-free music sales, Apple announced the same. Again, the NY Times reporting,
Quote:
“Apple definitely wanted to remove D.R.M. from music, but the record labels would not allow them to renegotiate their licensing agreements, because they wanted to help competitors succeed against Apple in the market,” said Bill Rosenblatt, president of GiantSteps Media Technology Strategies, a consulting firm.

It is not clear what broke the impasse, but the deteriorating economy may have put pressure on music companies.

“For the major labels, it was clearly time for them to accelerate becoming digital music companies in a macroeconomic environment that is downright frightening,” said Greg Scholl, chief executive of The Orchard, a digital distributor of music from independent labels.

The compromise gives the recording industry new leverage over their online music sales, Mr. Scholl added. They can start to sell new tracks at the higher price, then gradually drop prices to keep sales moving. Labels could also experiment with bundled packages of songs and even special editions at higher prices.

Harry Wang, director of mobile product research at the consulting company Parks Associates, said, “They aren’t going to get a huge amount of money from this new arrangement, but in an ailing music industry, anything that can provide more money will be better than the status quo.”

NaOH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 12:45 PM   #229
ThreeBKK
MVP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,626
New thread for that tangent, please.
__________________

➤ Think it's a good idea to put your most intimate data on someone else's server?
Macmini5,2 2.7 GHz Core i7 Snow Leopard Mtn Lion
ThreeBKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 12:50 PM   #230
NaOH
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,852
I think I misunderstood your earlier statement. I read your last sentence here,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeBKK
I'm very interested in just sticking to facts, but how are you going to prove that your facts are accurate, and that mine are inaccurate? (Please don't do that in this thread.

to be a reference to your numerous earlier statements about the Mac App Store being along the lines of "I think the store will mean..."

Sorry about that mistake.
NaOH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 03:59 PM   #231
tw
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,263
First time using App Store today

AAAAAAAaaaaaaaarrrrrr-rrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhhhH-HHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!

I cannot remember anything that I have despised so thoroughly in my entire life.
__________________
Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language. -LW-
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 07:12 PM   #232
NovaScotian
League Commissioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 5,156
My general feeling as well, tw.
__________________
17" MBP, OS X; 27" iMac, both OS X 10.10.x (latest)
NovaScotian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 09:35 PM   #233
fracai
MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
I cannot remember anything that I have despised so thoroughly in my entire life.

What specifically? Aside from the actual restrictions on apps (TextWrangler not being able to install the command line tools, etc.) I've been pretty happy with it. It doesn't cover my every need, but it's generally been a smooth experience for me.
fracai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 10:14 PM   #234
tw
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by fracai
What specifically? Aside from the actual restrictions on apps (TextWrangler not being able to install the command line tools, etc.) I've been pretty happy with it. It doesn't cover my every need, but it's generally been a smooth experience for me.

Just the whole experience was annoying. problems:
  • the interface (as far I can tell on short inspection) has no way to efficiently browse apps. I see a bunch of table cells that have name, icon, price and rating, but no description, so I have to open each one to get an idea of what it does
  • but there's no tabbing, so I can't open several apps from the main list and then browse them quickly, I have to drag through them one by one, which means a lot of back-and-forth if I want to compare two (or god forbid three) apps
  • the system forced me to enter all sorts of unneeded personal information - why the hell does the app store need to know whether I'm a mr., mrs., miss or dr., to the point where it refuses to let me continue signing up unless I tell it?
  • the system forced me to enter credit card information, even though I was only interested in looking at free apps. I DO NOT LIKE TO GIVE OUT CREDIT CARD INFORMATION UNLESS I'M READY TO BUY SOMETHING. That's just aggravating, and I am going to see if I can cancel my app store account just because of that - but they probably won't let me.
  • The system forces me to download everything into /Applications (I habitually use ~/Applications for third party apps, and it's annoying to have to enter an admin password just to download some free app and then have to enter it twice more to move the app where I want it and delete it from /Applications
  • The system asks me to enter the app store password far too frequently (enough that I find it irritating)
It's just a positively stupidly designed app that forces me to do things that I neither need nor want to do, and is not at all flexible towards the way I like to do things. You can just tell that whoever designed it was super focused on making it look *bright* and *cheerful* - like aqua on steroids - and totally slacked on the HIG and functionality aspects. I kept thinking about the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation...

I'm simply not going to use it again unless I absolutely, positively, no other options have to. It sucks.
__________________
Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language. -LW-
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 10:16 PM   #235
edalzell
MVP
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
It's just a positively stupidly designed app that forces me to do things that I neither need nor want to do, and is not at all flexible towards the way I like to do things. You can just tell that whoever designed it was super focused on making it look *bright* and *cheerful* - like aqua on steroids - and totally slacked on the HIG and functionality aspects. I kept thinking about the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation...

Just like the App Store. Not aimed at you. Aimed at the other 95% of Mac users who never bought software before.
edalzell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2011, 12:57 AM   #236
ThreeBKK
MVP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,626
Thank you tw for posting that. I have not yet "upgraded" to 10.6.6 and the Mac App Store yet, so it's nice to be reminded again why I've been avoiding it for this long.

Maybe there's no point in trying to resist. The way I see it, Apple will be doing everything they can to make sure the Mac App Store is the only way to get apps on our Macs, just like the other iDevices.
__________________

➤ Think it's a good idea to put your most intimate data on someone else's server?
Macmini5,2 2.7 GHz Core i7 Snow Leopard Mtn Lion
ThreeBKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2011, 01:34 AM   #237
NaOH
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeBKK
I have not yet "upgraded" to 10.6.6 and the Mac App Store yet, so it's nice to be reminded again why I've been avoiding it for this long.

Why avoid upgrading beyond 10.6.5? You deny yourself bug fixes, security enhancements and other updates (i.e., today's Java update), but you're no more required to use, let alone launch, the Mac App Store application under 10.6.8 than you are under 10.6.5.
NaOH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2011, 01:49 PM   #238
ThreeBKK
MVP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,626
If I'm understanding it correctly, there's more to the 10.6.6 update than just a single additional application. There's a lot of stuff under the hood that was put there to support the Mac App Store and make it just work, or not work, as sometimes the case may be.

Unfortunately, Apple hasn't made it, or couldn't make it, modular and separate from the OS updates. That's a shame because I'd like to be able to upgrade the OS without committing to all of that hidden support structure, at least until I see where they're going with this.

One question that comes to mind: Was it technically impossible to keep the Mac App Store separate from regular OS updates, or did Apple combine them intentionally to force all Snow Leopard users to jump in?
__________________

➤ Think it's a good idea to put your most intimate data on someone else's server?
Macmini5,2 2.7 GHz Core i7 Snow Leopard Mtn Lion
ThreeBKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2011, 02:06 PM   #239
hayne
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 32,473
I haven't looked at the technical details about the App Store implementation. But nothing is technically impossible - it's just that some things are much easier to do. Apple's applications often rely on infrastructure that is supplied by OS X updates. And the security aspects of the App Store clearly need some OS support.

The larger issue is that it is not tenable to just stay on some old version of OS X and refuse updates. There have been and will continue to be important security fixes that come with the OS X updates and you need to install these if you don't want to risk losing control of your Mac (via malware).
If you have lost trust in Apple, then you would be best advised to move over completely to Linux where (at least in theory) you can check on what the OS is doing.
__________________
hayne.net/macosx.html
hayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2011, 03:18 PM   #240
tlarkin
League Commissioner
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,352
If you are a developer you must download all your dev builds from the app store with your apple ID. It puts everything in /Applications automatically, and you have to "purchase" the app (for free since you are a dev) and a lot of times it lacks options.

I don't get the point of this....

I prefer direct downloads where I can pick and choose what revisions I want. Also, this requires me to create an additional Apple ID to use at work, or add my personal one to my work's enterprise dev account.

Overall, bad idea, and annoying if you ask me.
__________________
sudo make me a sammich
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site design © IDG Consumer & SMB; individuals retain copyright of their postings
but consent to the possible use of their material in other areas of IDG Consumer & SMB.