Go Back   The macosxhints Forums > OS X Help Requests > Hardware and Peripherals



Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-10-2012, 12:35 AM   #1
Paul P
Triple-A Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 95
Which computer would be a faster renderer ?

Hello all,

I currently have a Mac Pro tower, a 2.1 model. It is an 8 core, 3 GHz model. I am thinking of "upgrading" this to a Mac Pro 3.1, a 2.8GHz model, also 8 core. The only thing that would convince me to upgrade would be if the 3.1 is faster at rendering still life architectural visualisations. I am not currently using a GPU based renderer, so my question really only applies to traditional renderers that are entirely CPU based.

Assuming all other things are equal (same hard drives, same amount of RAM, same programs) is it even possible to say which computer would be a faster renderer, without buying the 3.1 and testing it ? If so, how would I go about ascertaining this ? Are there certain machine specs that I should look at more than others ?

Many thanks in advance.
Paul P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 12:53 AM   #2
mclbruce
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul P
... Assuming all other things are equal (same hard drives, same amount of RAM, same programs) is it even possible to say which computer would be a faster renderer, without buying the 3.1 and testing it ?

Bus speed and amount of L2 cache are different, according to MacTracker app.

http://www.mactracker.ca/

I have no idea how much that will affect your work. Have you checked out barefeets.com? Their comparisons may be helpful.

http://www.barefeats.com/nehal04.html
mclbruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 12:55 AM   #3
acme.mail.order
League Commissioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 6,057
You'd have to test it. At that performance level there are too many variables in the process, and usually the CPU isn't the bottleneck anymore.

Offhand, I would say that a faster memory bus will make the difference in your instance more than a faster processor. 8 cores won't help at all unless the process (and program) allow for parallel rendering.

If you buy new, add memory. Lots and lots of memory.
acme.mail.order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 03:04 AM   #4
Paul P
Triple-A Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 95
Thanks for your help everyone. Much appreciated.
Paul P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 12:23 AM   #5
anthlover
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,703
I would check Geek bench. My seat of the Pants feeling without checking is you would have to go to a fairly current model to make a difference. Most of the Mac Pros in the time frame you mention scored in 10k to 12k range. I believe the top model last I checked prior the minor refresh (before the major one everyone is waiting for) was around 22K. ** And indeed after checking the machines are a wash. You need a 12 Core current monster Something in the 15 to 22k range geek bench wise.

Here are the specifics

http://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks

Everymac,com helps too they have the Geek bench scores and you can look up my model e.g. 2,1 and 3,1

http://everymac.com/search/search.ht...s=919j181139j7

Last edited by anthlover; 10-29-2012 at 12:35 AM.
anthlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site design © IDG Consumer & SMB; individuals retain copyright of their postings
but consent to the possible use of their material in other areas of IDG Consumer & SMB.