|
|
#1 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
Yes, good news! And includes over 700 binary packages for OS X 10.2 as well as over 1800 source packages of all kinds.
And remember, this release is for Mac OS X 10.2 only. Cheers... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
|
Install issues: selfupdate attempts to install 0.4.1a
I was waiting all day to come home to "selfupdate"
Anyway, I ran into the following issue on my TiBook: [marley:~] % fink -version Package manager version: 0.9.1 Distribution version: 0.3.0 The Fink Upgrade Matrix (http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/upgrade.php) tells me to: "Fink official binary distribution, version 0.3.x or later: Update using "fink selfupdate". If you have an install from 10.1, you may need to do so twice to be fully updated." So, I run: [marley:~] % sudo fink selfupdate Password: rm -f LATEST-FINK curl -L -s -S -o LATEST-FINK http://fink.sourceforge.net/LATEST-FINK A new Fink distribution release is available. I will now download the package descriptions for Fink 0.4.1a and update the core packages. After that, you should update the other packages using commands like 'fink update-all'. gzip -dc packages-0.4.1a.tar.gz | tar -xf - gzip: packages-0.4.1a.tar.gz: not in gzip format ./inject.pl /sw Can't exec "./inject.pl": No such file or directory at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 180. ### ./inject.pl failed, exit code -1 Failed: injecting the new package definitions from packages-0.4.1a.tar.gz failed So, the "selfupdate" command is trying to download and install release 0.4.1a!! Anyone else see similar issues? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
That's a very old version. So probably it's allright if first it upgrades to 0.4.1a , as the message said: "you may need to do so twice to be fully updated" What's your 'sw_vers'? Remember that this release is for 10.2 only. It seems it fails to inject the package,because of a missing file. Maybe you post the error message at the Fink-users list. Cheers... |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
|
[marley:~] cschorr% sw_vers
ProductName: Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.2.2 BuildVersion: 6F21 I was assuming that the Distribution Version (0.3.0) was the version that is referenced in Fink's upgrade matrix. They don't differentiate between distro version and "package manager version" |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
LizardKing,
Code:
256 Sao @ ~ $ fink -V
Package manager version: 0.11.1
Distribution version: 0.5.0.cvs
Do you have by chance 'tetex' installed ? Cheers... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
|
no, I never installed tetex (quickly verified by running 'fink list' and checking installed packages).
The thing that is interesting to me is the link in this command (which is run during selfupdate): curl -L -s -S -o LATEST-FINK http://fink.sourceforge.net/LATEST-FINK If you click on the above link it will return a page with the text '0.4.1a' (at least it is as of 11:38PM EST). curious.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
LizardKing,
Well, it might be wrong or in your case it might be normal that it first installs 0.4.1a, as your former version is quite old. But, I don't know why it fails to inject the package, as this last upgrade matrix method is new to me. As I said, it would be interesting that you post the error messages you got at the fink-users list, together with your system information. And please, let us know what the fink developers say about your problem. Cheers... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 66
|
I am also have the problem where I am getting the message
You already have the package descriptions from the latest Fink point release. (installed:0.4.1a available:0.4.1a) This is definitely not true.... or we wouldnt have a thread titled Fink .0.50a relased now would we? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
All Star
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 534
|
FWIW,
I'm doing the usual 'fink selfupdate-cvs' followed by 'fink update-all' and it's churning away on the update-all at the moment. Seems all is working well so I believe I will have the correct installation when it's done. .... Okay, this is what I've got now: fink -V Package manager version: 0.11.1 Distribution version: 0.5.0a.cvs This must be the new number, I assume. Last edited by thatch; 12-10-2002 at 02:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,390
|
existing software
I previously installed mysql (from entropy.ch I think). Any way to "convince" fink that I already have mysql installed so that it will be automagically updated?
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
For new users they can download the Fink 0.5.0a Binary Installer - (11 MB) from here:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/index.php Remember, 10.1 users - they should use Fink 0.4.1 I finally upgraded, but ran 'fink selfupdate-cvs', as I prefer to get packages from the cvs repository, so the distribution version now is: Code:
258 Sao @ ~ $ fink -V Package manager version: 0.11.1 Distribution version: 0.5.0a.cvs It looks like 0.5.0a is a final release The package manager version is actually: ................... Unpacking replacement fink ... Setting up fink (0.11.1-10) ... .................. The core packages installed versions are: pkg base-files version ### pkg base-files version 1.6-1 pkg bzip2 version ### pkg bzip2 version 1.0.2-1 pkg debianutils version ### pkg debianutils version 1.23-1 pkg dpkg version ### pkg dpkg version 1.9.20-4 pkg fink version ### pkg fink version 0.11.1-10 pkg gettext version ### pkg gettext version 0.10.40-3 pkg gzip version ### pkg gzip version 1.2.4a-6 pkg libiconv version ### pkg libiconv version 1.7-5 pkg ncurses version ### pkg ncurses version 5.2-9 pkg tar version ### pkg tar version 1.13.25-1 pkg apt version ### pkg apt version 0.5.4-7 pkg apt-shlibs version ### pkg apt-shlibs version 0.5.4-7 pkg storable-pm version ### pkg storable-pm version 1.0.14-1 Cheers... Last edited by sao; 12-10-2002 at 03:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Major Leaguer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 373
|
ThAnX
Sao Please let me thank you at this time for all the help you gave me via your superbe posts concerning Fink before the 0.5.0a release. I have certainly learned more about the labyrinth which is Unix and about compiling than I have during all my years as a Debian and BSD user. I was very happy to note that when I typed "fink --version" in a terminal, I was presented with a "0.5.0a" as reply, Last login: Tue Dec 10 07:18:51 on console Welcome to Darwin! [Kaos:~] kaos% fink --version Package manager version: 0.11.1 Distribution version: 0.5.0a.cvs so for me the release is a moot question. I am glad I did it the hard way before, not only because of what I have learned through trial and error and on these boards, but because I now have a system that compares favoribly with the the most well configured Linux systems I have used. PS: I must have spent days and days reading your posts in an historical, if not hysterical, fashion. You could compie a book from this marvelous chronology of help that you have shared with others! Cheers and Thanks again!
Last edited by Glanz; 12-10-2002 at 10:23 AM. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
Glanz,
Thanks for your kind words. I enjoy posting about Fink very much but all the praise should be going to the Fink developers for the tremendous work done. As I read in a post at the fink-beginners list by Daniel Lord: <<"It is more than the Source Forge Product of the Month: for I cannot describe in one message the vastness of body of software fink opens to the OS X user. In sum, it makes the Mac simply the most versatile, powerful desktop Unix on the market, bar none. Thank you.">> And I agree 100% with that. Cheers... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 66
|
Maybe somebody knows how to rebuild the package list? I updated to 0.50a.cvs, but when I try to install some packages (i.e. r-base) i get this message:
Failed: no package found for specification 'r-base'! even though the package is in stable por 0.5.0a. My guess is that during the update process my package list was somehow corrupted..Anybody know what to do about this? ateles |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,562
|
Arggggh...will it never end (insert hair-pulling)? Took me a while to finally get my XDarwin to start displaying the cursors properly again (e.g. with the proper masks so that you can see a black cursor on a black window or background). Never sure what I did to fix it either. Now after updating to 0.50a last night:
fink selfupdate-cvs I am back to having the cursor screwed - no mask. Any help appreciated! Thx. INFO ------ Package manager version: 0.11.1 Distribution version: 0.5.0a.cvs |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 126
|
% fink install blackbox
sudo /sw/bin/fink install blackbox Password: Information about 792 packages read in 2 seconds. pkg blackbox version ### Failed: no version info available for blackbox I really wish I knew what I was doing... IceWM installed just fine and is now set as my default (for now.) % fink --version Package manager version: 0.11.1 Distribution version: 0.5.0a.cvs % sw_vers ProductName: Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.2.2 BuildVersion: 6F21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
ateles,
Check if you have it at: /sw/fink/10.2/stable/main/finkinfo/sci/r-base-1.6.1-2.info and can you show me the result of: ls -l /sw/fink/dists Maybe try running: 'fink fetch-misssing' and then 'fink scanpackages' Cheers... Last edited by sao; 12-10-2002 at 03:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Major Leaguer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 373
|
A masterpiece of compilation!!!
I also agree! One more thing. After twisting and turning a few applications so that they would compile on Darwin 6.2, such as Mozilla before I even knew that Fink had already done it, I can appreciate the amount of work that went into this. That isn't the first time I have re-invented the wheel, nor will it be the last. Fink is a masterpiece. It even works better than most Linux distros, except for Gentoo because there is no optimization lag. I plan to help the project in any way I can, mostly by finding glitches and their exact causes. I do not feel I am competent enough to do much more than that. The competence of all those who brought this together surprises and encourages me. I'll test anything! After all, I wouldn't want to use something more stable than I am myself. So it's the unstable tree for meee. I started testing Debian when it first came out, and I'm still testing it . I don't believe I have ever used a "stable" version of it either.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
All Star
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 534
|
justinp, what does 'fink info blackbox' give you? Here's what it gives me:
fink info blackbox Information about 1860 packages read in 2 seconds. pkg blackbox version ### pkg blackbox version 0.65.0-1 blackbox-0.65.0-1: Alternate Window Manager, basic version Blackbox is yet another addition to the list of window managers for the Open Group's X Window System, Version 11 Release 6 and above. Blackbox is built with C++, sharing no common code with any other window manager (even though the graphics implementation is similar to that of Window Maker). . Web site: http://blackboxwm.sourceforge.net/ . Maintainer: Christian Swinehart <cswinehart@users.sourceforge.net> |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|