|
|
#1 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: los alamos
Posts: 96
|
fink binary upgrade failing
i have fink 0.5.1 binaries happily functioning on several 10.2.5 machines. i followed the instructions given on the fink homepage for upgrading to fink 0.5.2 - Update normally through dselect: Choose "[U]pdate", then "[I]nstall". it seemed to run just fine, no errors were generated. however, i don't see any of the binaries that are new to 0.5.2 (e.g., flac or rsync). in fact,
% fink --version Package manager version: 0.12.1 Distribution version: 0.5.1 so although i've "updated" its still listed as 0.5.1. any thoughts? thanks fxt Last edited by fxt; 04-16-2003 at 01:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
fxt,
Try running: 'fink scanpackages' |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: los alamos
Posts: 96
|
hi sao,
thanks for the tip. still stuck at 0.5.1 though: % fink scanpackages sudo /sw/bin/fink scanpackages Information about 925 packages read in 0 seconds. dpkg-scanpackages dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc override | gzip >dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/Packages.gz Wrote 0 entries to output Packages file. dpkg-scanpackages dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc override | gzip >dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/Packages.gz Wrote 0 entries to output Packages file. dpkg-scanpackages dists/stable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc override | gzip >dists/stable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc/Packages.gz Wrote 0 entries to output Packages file. dpkg-scanpackages dists/local/bootstrap/binary-darwin-powerpc override | gzip >dists/local/bootstrap/binary-darwin-powerpc/Packages.gz Wrote 0 entries to output Packages file. % fink --version Package manager version: 0.12.1 Distribution version: 0.5.1 short of nuking /sw and using the 0.5.2 installer, is there anything else i should try? thanks! fxt Last edited by fxt; 04-16-2003 at 12:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
fxt,
Yes, I never liked dselect Maybe you just try with apt, run: 'sudo apt-get update' to get the latest package list, and then: 'sudo apt-get upgrade' to update all packages that have new versions available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: los alamos
Posts: 96
|
hi sao,
% sudo apt-get update Password: Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/release/main Packages Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/release/main Release Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/release/crypto Packages Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/release/crypto Release Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/current/main Packages Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/current/main Release Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/current/crypto Packages Hit http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2/current/crypto Release Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done % sudo apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. % fink --version Package manager version: 0.12.1 Distribution version: 0.5.1 i recall having the same difficulty when transitioning from 0.5 to 0.5.1. the thought of nuking /sw to install 0.5.2 on five machines isn't super appealing. i'm curious if anyone else who uses only the binary packages is seeing this upgrade problem, or if its just my special curse. fxt Last edited by fxt; 04-16-2003 at 12:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
fxt,
Where do you have 'source /sw/bin/init.csh' in your ~/.cshrc file? And do you have also a ~/.tcshrc file? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: los alamos
Posts: 96
|
hi sao,
i only run a ~/.tcshrc file., not a .cshrc file. is this a problem? if so, why? % more .tcshrc # new files are rd-able/x-able by all, writable only by owner umask 22 limit coredumpsize 0 # mac defaults # limit datasize 6144 kbytes # limit stacksize 512 kbytes limit datasize unlimited limit stacksize unlimited # for fink with mac osx source /sw/bin/init.csh and so on. fxt |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
fxt,
Thanks again to Alexander Hansen who made me aware of the small link at the the news item at the Fink site: http://fink.sourceforge.net/ that says "consult these special instructions": ------------------- Repairing the Upgrade Path Install an older version of the fink package manager, by running the following commands in a Terminal.app window: Code:
curl -O http://us.dl.sf.net/fink/direct_down...in-powerpc.deb sudo dpkg -i fink_0.11.1-10_darwin-powerpc.deb rm fink_0.11.1-10_darwin-powerpc.deb Now update as usual, by running fink selfupdate. Hope it works... Last edited by sao; 04-16-2003 at 04:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: los alamos
Posts: 96
|
hi sao,
first, thanks for your time and energy in helping me get to the bottom of this. the link off the fink homepage says "If you are having trouble upgrading a source installation ...". do you think i should try the suggested solution even though i'm only using the binary distribution? fxt |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,237
|
fxt,
Yes, go ahead and give it a try. I heard that these instructions worked fine. Let me know and good luck...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Triple-A Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: los alamos
Posts: 96
|
hi sao,
perfect! so it works for both source and binary installations: % fink --version Package manager version: 0.12.1 Distribution version: 0.5.2 now i can see all the new goodies :) thank you again for your time and advice. fxt |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,016
|
I echo the thanks. I couldn't update either. I thought they were probably behind on posting the updated files. But the "special instructions" fixed my problem too. I never thought to try them because my installation was binary, not a source install.
Chris |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|