|
|
#1 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
I have revived an early G4 MacMini for use as a starter media server. It was reluctant to startup after some months (years?) unused but after using disc utility and Disk Warrior it has revived.
However in the process it only has 63.23 GB showing on the HD. The HD is a WD Scorpio Blue WD3200BEVE PATA and shows 320GB on the label and the spec sheet. Currently running 10.4.11 as I thought a more contemporary OS might help. Can anyone shed any light on what is going on please? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,611
|
Shows 320Gb on what label?
Has the drive been partitioned? Open Disk Utility: Applications>Utilities?Disk Utility Take a look in the Sidebar on the left and tell us what is listed there.
__________________
LoadsaMacs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
The label is the WD label on the outside of the hard drive case clearly stating this is a 320GB drive.
Disk utility shows 63.2 GB WDC WD3200BEVE. Single partition: Apple Partition Map: MacOS extended journalled It says S.M.A.R.T Status not supported Any ideas Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
All Star
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India
Posts: 506
|
320 GB sounds quite large for an early G4 MacMini.
According to the Apple spec sheet http://support.apple.com/kb/sp65 - this model only had either a 40 or an 80Gb HD. Sounds like it does not support a 320Gb HD. This would maybe account for the anomaly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boulder, CO USA
Posts: 19,550
|
The hard drive case? Is this an internal or an external drive?
Could we see a screenshot of Disk Utility with this drive selected? Please select the hard drive itself, which will be left-justified in the list, not the partition, which will be indented. Also, could we see the results of the following commands, copy/pasted into your Terminal? ls -alOe /Volumes diskutil list df -aH id echo "done" Trevor
__________________
How to ask questions the smart way |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
League Commissioner
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,958
|
Although that's true about original specs, the Mac mini does not have a hard drive capacity limitation. Even if that were so, it would be the normal large drive limitation of 128GB.
The part number is also correct for a 320GB W-D hard drive. And, that would not be an original hard drive for the mini. I would suggest reformatting the hard drive with Disk Utility, writing zeroes for one pass. That might recover full use of that hard drive If not, I think you should choose not to trust that hard drive for anything important. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
Thank you Trevor
The following are the results from the terminal query with my personal details removed. Code:
Last login: Mon May 7 20:47:14 on console unknown000D935F39DC:~ fred$ unknown000D935F39DC:~ fred$ ls -alOe /Volumes total 8 drwxrwxrwt@ 5 root admin hidden 170 7 May 20:47 . drwxrwxr-t 33 root admin - 1190 7 May 20:46 .. drwxrwxr-t 36 root admin - 1292 7 May 18:32 MINI MAX System Clone drwxr-xr-x 10 fred fred - 408 7 May 16:53 MINI MAX data lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin - 1 7 May 20:46 revised -> / unknown000D935F39DC:~ fred$ diskutil list /dev/disk0 #: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER 0: Apple_partition_scheme *63.2 Gi disk0 1: Apple_partition_map 31.5 Ki disk0s1 2: Apple_HFS revised 63.1 Gi disk0s3 /dev/disk1 #: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER 0: Apple_partition_scheme *465.8 Gi disk1 1: Apple_partition_map 31.5 Ki disk1s1 2: Apple_Driver43 28.0 Ki disk1s2 3: Apple_Driver43 28.0 Ki disk1s3 4: Apple_Driver_ATA 28.0 Ki disk1s4 5: Apple_Driver_ATA 28.0 Ki disk1s5 6: Apple_FWDriver 256.0 Ki disk1s6 7: Apple_Driver_IOKit 256.0 Ki disk1s7 8: Apple_Patches 256.0 Ki disk1s8 9: Apple_HFS MINI MAX System Clone 67.9 Gi disk1s10 10: Apple_HFS MINI MAX data 397.6 Gi disk1s12 unknown000D935F39DC:~ fred$ df -aH Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/disk0s3 68G 13G 54G 20% / devfs 114k 114k 0B 100% /dev fdesc 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev map -hosts 0B 0B 0B 100% /net map auto_home 0B 0B 0B 100% /home /dev/disk1s10 73G 13G 60G 19% /Volumes/MINI MAX System Clone /dev/disk1s12 427G 453M 427G 1% /Volumes/MINI MAX data I have a second Firewire drive attached with two partitions. To avoid confusion the problem drive is a replacement internal drive. I am not trusting the drive and these enquiries are about trying to see if there is a reason for the problem. Thanks in advance Last edited by trevor; 05-08-2012 at 12:14 PM. Reason: Added [code] tags around Terminal output for easier readability |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
Sorry, smaller file attached
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
Thank you
I will try the reformat with overwrite. I have erased and reformatted previously with no significant change, I think the capacity may have changed by a few k. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
This time there should be a Disc Util screen shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
League Commissioner
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,958
|
Why is the System Clone partition almost identical in size to your internal drive? Was that created BEFORE your formatted your internal, or simply a recent backup?
Try booting to that Clone (bootable, I expect?), Open Disk Utility, and click on the 63.2 line, then the Partition tab and change the Partition Scheme to 1 Partition, and click the Apply button. Does that return the drive to a full (around 300 GB) partition size? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Prospect
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
Thanks for the suggestion, I have already tried changing the partition size. It is currently a single partition. The system clone size was set at around 60GB as it seemed a sensible size.
The external drive was partitioned and made bootable after the problem was seen with the first drive. I originally tried to load 10.5 onto the internal drive but there were problems so I reverted to 10.4 which loaded fine. I suspected the 10.5 disc. All disks are generic family packs. I then formatted the two partition external firewire and copied to the external system clone using Carbon Copy cloner. Booting from the clone allowed disc utility to be used on reformatting etc. As I wanted 10.5 I loaded 10 .5 onto the clone. I then copied (cloned) back to the internal so it ran 10.5. In all of this the internal sticks at 63.2 GB. I have also tried the erase and writing zeros. Disc size is still showing 63.2. Next step is copying back the 10.5.8 to the internal. Puzzling eh? Any other ideas? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
League Commissioner
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,958
|
Yes
Disk Utility thinks your hard drive is the "63.2 GB". That is, of course, incorrect. If changing the partition scheme in Disk Utility does not recover any space, you should then also suspect that the hard drive is failing, as something about how it reports its own size is corrupted. I suspect that it may be unreliable in other ways, too. Replace your internal hard drive... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boulder, CO USA
Posts: 19,550
|
Yeah, I agree with DeltaMac--replace that internal drive. I'm not at all sure WHY the drive is reporting so strangely--that's not a typical failure mode at all--but the fact that it is makes me distrustful of it.
Trevor
__________________
How to ask questions the smart way |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Major Leaguer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Redhill, Surrey, England
Posts: 479
|
Clipped drive ?
Hi,
The only thing that comes to mind is if the HDD has been "clipped" (jumper or software) or had a HPA/DCO set up on it. It is possible that the HDD firmware has been corrupted giving similar effects. Might be worth doing a factory reset with the WD tool (Windows) and/or installing the firmware (windows again). All long shots I know, but if you have access to a PC (and a 2.5" to 3.5" ATA adapter) it might be worth trying before binning the drive. Regards, Nick |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boulder, CO USA
Posts: 19,550
|
That's a good thought, but here are the actual jumper settings for this drive: ![]() I don't think that any of those jumper settings would clip the drive. I'm not sure about software clipping--I suspect that would have to be either in the hard drive controller (which doesn't clip the drive in a Mac Mini) or in the drive firmware. Trevor
__________________
How to ask questions the smart way |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|