![]() |
Quote:
VERY stupid if you ask me. |
Quote:
How in the hell will I target mode boot them then? Over USB? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I guess if such a level of service access is necessary, they'll have to be booted off of an external USB drive.
|
Quote:
|
It's annoying, yeah. USB isn't as fast. The only reason I'm not reacting more negatively is that my drives are FireWire+USB, though their USB ports are avoided whenever possible.
|
Quote:
Plus, I got a few Firewire camcorders I use on occasion. So I'll be sticking with my old MacBook. |
.
I am dying to know: Has anyone heard Apple give anything resembling an "official" reason for dropping FW on the MacBooks? I’m at a total loss as to why they did this. USB is soooo sloooow by comparison! I was about to purchase one, but now I’m tempted to refrain. |
I just read off dig, that target mode is not possible on the Macbooks
http://apcmag.com/Content.aspx?id=3085 This is one thing I really hate about Apple. They don't give their customers the choices they want. They just build the product and say, here ya go! |
Quote:
Trevor |
I still don't get why they removed 400 altogether, and only left 800 on the Pros. This would have worked a lot easier if the FW400 plug was the same as the FW800.
I think Apple is trying to further divide the gap between 'regular people' and 'professionals'. Or something. Or maybe this is like the same thing a decade ago when Apple removed floppy drives from all of their Macs. Perhaps Apple is trying to move people to Firewire 800? And I'm reading about DisplayPort, and it sounds like there's a mini-war going on between HDMI and DisplayPort. There's a bunch of companies supporting each. Apple, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Texas Instruments, Molex, AMD and Nvidia support DisplayPort. Panasonic, Toshiba, Sharp, Philips, RCA, and Sony are supporting HDMI. What's interesting is that it seems mainly computer-related companies are supporting DP, while most TV manufacturers (although they might make some laptops too) are supporting HDMI. Both connectors are similar, although |
That doesn't sound far from the truth, ThreeDee. Possibly Apple is trying to differentiate the models with the lack of Firewire because the Pro and regular MacBook look and act the same.
Especially so with the departure of integrated graphics on the MacBook. |
I am wondering if it is because most consumer MacBook users (i.e. not us) used FireWire for their video cameras but more video cameras now use USB or those solid state cards.
|
Quote:
...why not equip Macs, especially the MBP and desktops, with eSATA ports? Isn’t it about time? Are there any disadvantages? Aren’t there major speed differences between this and FW400 / FW800? |
Quote:
|
.
Tom, if I remember correctly, I purchased my three quad-interface (incl. eSATA) external disks well over two years ago. |
Quote:
Two years is a pretty new technology in terms of being mass produced. In retrospect 2 years is old when you are 'cutting edge.' Hahahaha |
I haven't seen mass adoption of eSATA yet. Nor have I with DisplayPort.
What I'm thinking is this: Didn't Apple do this when DVI wasn't as known as it is now? Didn't Apple ALSO do this with USB? Looking back in history, this move to use DisplayPort seems less and less surprising. |
If they ditched firewire, how are you supposed to transfer all of your stuff from your old mac with the assistant on your new mac?:confused:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site design © IDG Consumer & SMB; individuals retain copyright of their postings
but consent to the possible use of their material in other areas of IDG Consumer & SMB.