![]() |
follow focus in mas osX
The default? behaviour in X is follow focus. Does mac osX support follow focus mode ??
Does X running ontop of osX support it ? JonB |
no. yes.
|
noooooo :(
I cant live without follow focus mode. Cant i pay someone and get a util that allows osX to do follow focus mode ? JonB |
No, from what I've read it just not doable. Apple's code doesn't even allow the possiblity.
|
DAMN!
stupid apple to make it like that.
follow focus is GREAT, and i think it is much more intuitive, "you type where the mouse pointer is" what about those virtual desktops that X has, does osX have those ? JonB |
Follow focus sucks ass. I'm happy Apple didn't do that with OS X.
There are some multiple desktop add ons from third parties though. None of the free ones have I have tried has been a real hit though. IMHO. |
Here, here.
Follow focus eats a big one. "Oh, crap, my optical mouse just jumped, and my windows went insane!" "Dammit, this trackpad is hard to--what's going on?!?" I don't want the OS doing something without me specifically saying, "Hey, Gomer, do this." Merely moving a cursor over something doesn't count as that. -/- Mikey-San |
Dear /PEZ and Mikey-San you guys dont need to post in my threads ever again.
I didnt ask for your opinion about follow focus or not. I asked if osX can do it. I asked because i like follow focus. Please take your flame's somewhere else. For all others: You are welcome to post, just notice i didnt ask about opinions, i asked if osX can do it or not, and later on if i can get virtuel desktops. I dont care if you dont like either teknology, i do, and i'm the one going to use it. JonB |
Re: DAMN!
Quote:
Sorry for not obeying when being told not to post in your threads again. :) |
Re: Re: DAMN!
Quote:
Well, if you take a look at my original posting, it is a question. "The default? behaviour in X is follow focus. Does mac osX support follow focus mode ?? Does X running ontop of osX support it ?" Later i did state my opinion, but the first post states a question, and then this thread is a question. JonB |
hahah aha hha h ahaha 5 posts and he is already bossing people around.
Dude, follow focus means you have to move your mouse over the window.... so why dont you take that extra ****ing milliscond and click. As said before, follow focus sucks ass. |
and yes, X windows will do it.
and yes, mac OS X can ahve virtual windows... goto versiontracker.com and look up the software. I forget what its called, but you can search by "virtual" in the Mac OS X section and probably find it. |
Quote:
this is a public forum. we welcome differing opinions, rather than stomp on them. your post needs no clarification. |
i started the thread, then it is "mine".
Anyway, i am still posting because it might be that someone knows of a utility that can do what i want, and then i asked if i can get virtual desktops. JonB |
3 posts up ..... has your virtual desktop answer
|
Quote:
JonB |
It would be a real good thing not to have flame-fests here, cuz that makes me real cranky. Have a grown-up conversation about features, or lack thereof, OK?
This goes for all of you, including Merv and ponyhest. Am I being blunt enough? If this continues, the thread gets locked. Thanks -- da management. |
Quote:
JonB |
Have you sent feedback to Apple asking for this feature?
I think it's unlikely to happen since Apple is trying to gear things towards Mac/Win users and not X11 people, but it couldn't hurt to ask. I'm still waiting to see if XFree becomes part of the standard Darwin distribution. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No, i guess i should do that. I still dont know if i'm going to buy an apple, because i really really like follow focus. I guess i can run X on osX, but i havent tried it, so i dont know how good that is. To my knowledge you can get this behaviour in windows by 3.party utilities, but i might be wrong, as i dont use windows either. I dont think XFree will be included into Darwin, because X has quite a different look and feel than osX does, and i think apple likes to have a tight controll. Besides, if they included X, then application programmers might start to make X applications for osX, and not Carbon/Cocoa. JonB |
Timeline:
Post 1) Q: can it be done? Post 2) A: no Post 3) question is repeated Post 4) answer repeated Post 5) original poster opens up the conversation to opinion. Nuff said. |
Quote:
I still think it is stupid apple didnt give people the choice. I toke offence because of the words you used about a feature i like very much. JonB |
ponyhest,
Yes, you started this thread, but let's make it clear: Nobody owns it. So, let's "focus", as anybody can state his opinion as long as he is not abusing others. What I learned from what you said is: you don't even own a mac and you are already angry with apple: Quote:
Maybe, it would be better that you consider to stay where you are right now. As there you can enjoy 'follow focus'. Cheers... |
Well, maybe i should just buy a PC. The point is i think apple makes some nice hardware, and i would like to have that hardware. And since osX is made for the hardware, i might as well run osX as it would properly support the features better.
So, i wondered if i could get the mouse feature i liked. I guess i cant. So i guess i'll have to write to apple and suggest they make it. JonB |
Sao: I agree with you 100%. :cool:
I'd encourage people to take a brief refresher course on the terms you agreed to when you joined here. I may or may not 'own' a thread, but I'll sure manage them if I need to. |
Quote:
BTW, you can still own a Mac and enjoy 'follow focus' if you install XFree86 and use fullscreen mode in X11. And switch between systems easily. Yes, and Apple makes nice hardware and some nice sofware too, you will be impressed with iDVD, iTunes, iMovie, iPhoto, etc. Good luck. Cheers... PS: But, please whatever you do, don't buy a PC. You will have to live with that decision for the rest of your life. |
Quote:
Yes, the iTools are kind of nice, i've seen them demonstrated, and they make good use of the hardware, thats another reason i'm considering it. JonB ps: :-) nice ps |
Check out CodeTek VirtualDesktop. I haven't tried it but it lists "Focus follows mouse support" in the "What's new in this version" list.
Erik |
Quote:
price, and i've got what i want :) :) :) JonB ps: it's because of posts like Erik that i'm still sticking arround |
Quote:
Back when I started the original thread, the focus follows mouse support I was talking about was specifically the focus, not the window ordering. If a large window was in front and overlapped a smaller window in the background, you could move the mouse over the smaller window and it was get focus but it wouldn't come to the foreground. ... |
Quote:
I was talking just about focus too, not raising or lowering of windows. JonB |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Okay, but the raised window does get focus, right ?? I could live with that, because i rarely have my windows overlap anyway. JonB |
I don't even know what this thread is about, but Focus Layer X apeared on macupdate today...
You may now resume the flame fest. |
Program: Mousigator 0.5.5
Licence: Shareare Description: Mousigator is a system extension that implements cursor focusing for the MacOS. Cursor focusing is activating a window, bringing it to the front, by just moving the cursor over the window; you don't have to click in it. This can be useful to help reduce those mouse-induced stress injuries. NOTE: Only runs on OS9 Website http://www.shack.org/zzhumphreyt/mousigator MacUpdate http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/1989 |
Mousigator :)
i hope they port it to OSX
JonB |
Codetek VirtualDesktop 2.0 offers this option.
It works like a charm. DahDee |
cooool :)
thanks for telling me :)
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site design © IDG Consumer & SMB; individuals retain copyright of their postings
but consent to the possible use of their material in other areas of IDG Consumer & SMB.