The macosxhints Forums

The macosxhints Forums (http://hintsforums.macworld.com/index.php)
-   Tweaking OS X / Wish List (http://hintsforums.macworld.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   10.4 Wishlist - Yet again! (http://hintsforums.macworld.com/showthread.php?t=24983)

yellow 06-30-2004 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig R. Arko
Because biting the heads off those chickens is so much fun? :rolleyes:

I suppose it's better than being called 'UNIX puke' or 'UNIX weenie.'

True. "Puke" is reserved for another OS. ;) "Weenie" is reserved for "Ball Park". I would prefer my subjects call me "Lord Master", or "Evil Tyrant". Possibly, "Woshisname". I digress! This is not the coatroom!

osxpounder 06-30-2004 04:01 PM

:LOL:

Back when it was still a novel thing to have computers speak aloud, I changed mine around so that it referred to me as "O Righteous Lawgiver and Ruler Of All That Thou Surveyest" or some such nonsense. Nowadays, I often change the voice alerts on my Macs to start with "Please, don't beat me" or "Great Googlymoogly!"

schneb 06-30-2004 06:08 PM

How about "Dear Facist Bully-boy" ala "The Young Ones"?

osxpounder 06-30-2004 06:19 PM

Lol!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by schneb
How about "Dear Facist Bully-boy" ala "The Young Ones"?

Well, sure, if I could get "Wick" to say it, or get the computer to use "Wick's" voice. Gotta love that Coventwy pwonunciation -- Wick totally wocks.

Craig R. Arko 06-30-2004 06:21 PM

I prefer "Payable to the order of...", all things considered. ;)

Anticipat3 07-06-2004 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hayne
I can't seem to find licensing info for XviD, but it certainly seems that Apple would have to pay a licensing fee to distribute DivX. See this page:
http://www.divx.com/divx/licensing/

Actually, it's only the "Pro" encoder software that costs money -- the decoder is free, and when used for players in personal computers, there would be no license fee. Apple could inclide a simple EULA (like many things in software update) that says "Hey, if this isn't personal, go pay for it."

yellow 07-06-2004 12:23 PM

Until people pay for Quicktime Pro, when then Apple has to drop a cut of the proceeds on the DivX folks, or they remove the DivX decoder plug-in. Which folks will then just download and install again. Better to skip the whole darned middleman and just let folks do it themselves.

Anticipat3 07-06-2004 12:30 PM

Why not have the Divx Encoder (Divx Pro) come with Quicktime Pro, even if a small cut of the proceeds do go to the DivX folks? Decoder functionality free, pay for Encodiing functionality. That's pretty standard fare.

Though it seems more like Apple is really pushing for the standard, free codecs... H264, etc. Too bad they're usually not as good... :-/


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site design © IDG Consumer & SMB; individuals retain copyright of their postings
but consent to the possible use of their material in other areas of IDG Consumer & SMB.