xiaodidi
11-14-2007, 02:35 PM
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20021011053443661
I noticed the complex instructions above to use dedicate partitions for /Users, /Applications, etc.
With OS 10.3, I managed to move the /Users to a separate partition just be doing a symbolic link, like this ("ls -l /" output)
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin [...] Users -> /Volumes/Users_Partition
no need to change the fstab file, netinfo, etc.
I can create and delete users and the proper data appears or disappears in "Users_Partition". The system has been stable for years. Recently I had some problems, reinstalled 10.3 with the same setup and has been running well for about a month. I am not interested in changing Applications and swap locations.
Is this too good to be true? Will it work with Leopard? I can try the upgrade but a little support won't hurt...
Thanks!
I noticed the complex instructions above to use dedicate partitions for /Users, /Applications, etc.
With OS 10.3, I managed to move the /Users to a separate partition just be doing a symbolic link, like this ("ls -l /" output)
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin [...] Users -> /Volumes/Users_Partition
no need to change the fstab file, netinfo, etc.
I can create and delete users and the proper data appears or disappears in "Users_Partition". The system has been stable for years. Recently I had some problems, reinstalled 10.3 with the same setup and has been running well for about a month. I am not interested in changing Applications and swap locations.
Is this too good to be true? Will it work with Leopard? I can try the upgrade but a little support won't hurt...
Thanks!